Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:56:02 -0600 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>, basile@...nsource.dyc.edu Subject: Re: NULL On 01/09/2013 05:02:29 AM, John Spencer wrote: > glibc defines NULL as __null: a magic variable supplied by GCC and > compatibles which always has pointer context. > > musl defines NULL to 0 in C++. > this is correct per the standard, but breaks a lot of software on > 64bit archs, > because it promotes to int. The C99 standard section 7.17 defines the NULL macro as: expands to an implementation-defined null pointer constant Which means it has pointer type. So either we can typecast it to void *, or we can rely on the LP64 standard (Linux, FreeBSD, and macosX all support) which says that long and pointer are always the same size on both 32 bit and 64 bit, so trivial fix would be #define NULL to (0L) http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.