Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:47:06 +0400 From: ojab <ojab@...b.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Status of 1.0 wishlist items? On 14.12.2012 02:03, Rich Felker wrote: >> - Development stack (GCC, LLVM/clang, GDB, strace, ...) > Has anybody built LLVM/clang on musl? I believe the set of patches > needed for GDB has been reduced quite a bit now, but I'm not sure what > the status on strace is... > LLVM/clang (x86_64) builds (on sabotage) with the small patch (in the attached file), but there are 15 test failing (mostly segfaults at include/llvm/Type.h:133, see attached log): Failing Tests (15): LLVM :: Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/instrument_global.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/instrument_initializer_metadata.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/atomic.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/read_before_write.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/read_from_global.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/tsan_basic.ll LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/vptr_update.ll LLVM :: Other/close-stderr.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/fprintf-1.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/fputs-1.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/osx-names.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/stpcpy-1.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/stpcpy_chk-1.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/strcmp-1.ll LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/strcpy_chk-1.ll In "[musl] Summary of 1.0 marketing plan/scheme/nefarious plot from IRC." thread there is pt. "- push "musl support" patches to other projects upstream all at once" — it's better to send patches to musl@ mail-list and leave it here or what? //wbr ojab View attachment "llvm-musl.diff" of type "text/plain" (974 bytes) View attachment "llvm_fails.log" of type "text/plain" (7492 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.