[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:47:06 +0400
From: ojab <ojab@...b.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Status of 1.0 wishlist items?
On 14.12.2012 02:03, Rich Felker wrote:
>> - Development stack (GCC, LLVM/clang, GDB, strace, ...)
> Has anybody built LLVM/clang on musl? I believe the set of patches
> needed for GDB has been reduced quite a bit now, but I'm not sure what
> the status on strace is...
>
LLVM/clang (x86_64) builds (on sabotage) with the small patch (in the
attached file), but there are 15 test failing (mostly segfaults at
include/llvm/Type.h:133, see attached log):
Failing Tests (15):
LLVM :: Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/instrument_global.ll
LLVM ::
Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/instrument_initializer_metadata.ll
LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/atomic.ll
LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/read_before_write.ll
LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/read_from_global.ll
LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/tsan_basic.ll
LLVM :: Instrumentation/ThreadSanitizer/vptr_update.ll
LLVM :: Other/close-stderr.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/fprintf-1.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/fputs-1.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/osx-names.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/stpcpy-1.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/stpcpy_chk-1.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/strcmp-1.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/strcpy_chk-1.ll
In "[musl] Summary of 1.0 marketing plan/scheme/nefarious plot from
IRC." thread there is pt. "- push "musl support" patches to other
projects upstream all at once" — it's better to send patches to musl@
mail-list and leave it here or what?
//wbr ojab
View attachment "llvm-musl.diff" of type "text/plain" (974 bytes)
View attachment "llvm_fails.log" of type "text/plain" (7492 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
