Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:40:22 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Difference between -O2 and -g On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:31:56AM +0800, Brian Wang wrote: > Hello all, > > I am experiencing a rather strange problem... > > I have an oldish kdrive/Xfbdev that works on my ARM device with > CodeSourcery toolchains. > Now, I tried it with musl (0.9.6 and the recent git master branch as well). > First it failed to find the screen and refused to start. After some naive > attempts with printf without success, I recompiled it with -g and no > -Ox with the hope that gdbserver > would help pin point the problem. However, with only -g, it runs! -g should have absolutely no effect on code behavior, but it sounds like your two setups are "-O2" and "-O0 -g" (where the -O0 is the default). If that's the case, when code behaves differently with different optimization levels, the cause is almost surely undefined behavior. Another possibility is a bug in musl (possibly an ARM-specific bug), but if you didn't recompile musl with different options, I doubt that's the cause. One very simple way to get a picture of what's going on in a program is to run it under strace. Try saving strace logs for both the working version and the broken version and comparing them either manually or with the diff utility (although the latter may be difficult unless you filter out the addresses and other contnets that will naturally differ, so it might be easier to visually inspect). If you don't already have an strace built for your target, I think Aboriginal Linux has static binaries you can use. If you're having trouble analyzing the results I'd be happy to help you. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.