[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: idunham@...abit.com
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] pcc support for configure
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> * Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> [2012-10-15 21:12:31 -0700]:
>> > +# Older PCC versions don't define __PIC__ with -fPIC
>> > +#
>> > +tryflag CFLAG_TEST "-x c"
>> > +printf '#ifndef __PIC__\n__PIC__=0\n#endif\n' | \
>> > +$CC -E $CFLAG_TEST -fPIC - | grep __PIC__ && \
>> > +CFLAGS_SHARED_ALL="$CFLAGS_SHARED_ALL -D__PIC__=1"
>> > +
>>
>> i don't think it's worth adding such checks
>>
> Agreed. I don't think there's a point in supporting old compiler
> versions except when there are possibly-compelling reasons to use
> them.
Dropping that.
View attachment "pcc.diff" of type "text/plain" (1170 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
