Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:09:45 +0200 From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: filesystem layout Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> writes: > On 09/25/2012 01:26 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:22:44PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >>> >>> Static linking could be dangerous from a security/maintainance >>> standpoint, but that is me looking at the specific scenarios in which >>> Gentoo shines. >> >> >> This is a common myth. lazy or ineffective system management is a >> danger regardless of the linking type. > > Spending lots of time unbundling dependencies from packages so they > could use the up-to-date shared version might bring you to have a bias. > > Any system management that force you to reinstall all your packages > because zlib had a bug doesn't seem efficient. Note that you need to *restart all programs using zlib* anyway. So what's the difference between tar xzpf base.tar.gz and tar xzpf zlib.tar.gz ? -- Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.