[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:01:03 +0200
From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: filesystem layout
Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> writes:
> @vision of the new platform
>
> http://sta.li/filesystem
>
> stali from http://suckless.org/ proposes an alternative filesystem
> scheme. It gives clear organization of the system... but not
> compatible with FHS. What do you think of this solution? Sabotage
> distro also has its own concept...
Sabotage's idea was essentially a symlink /usr -> / (and that came from
Hurd).
So far, the only good reason not to do that was that it's easier to put
/usr on a NFS shared among multiple hosts.
Regarding the stali idea, I don't think it is useful to make /devel
seperate (e.g. sabotage had development tools in a seperate set, but
installed them into /bin as well).
/lib/exec is not useful either. Daemons should go to /bin, programs
strictly for internal purporses can go to /lib/$pkgname/.
(This works well in Arch already.)
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
