Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:04:06 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl-gcc question On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:53:45PM -0400, idunham@...abit.com wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:50:13PM +0200, Jens wrote: > >> > >> Hello! > >> > >> Looks like musl-gcc in my uclibc environment doesn't work correctly > >> (for me): > > > > Aboriginal Linux? The problem is that the underlying gcc is not gcc, > > but Rob Landley's gcc wrapper which serves a similar purpose to > > musl-gcc, but using the command line rather than spec files, so it > > takes precedence. You need to either find a way to get musl-gcc to > > call the underlying gcc, or build a native toolchain. > > Rich, what would you think of changing from a hardcoded "gcc" to using > something along these lines: > > [ -z "$REALGCC" ] && REALGCC=gcc > $REALGCC <the current parameters> > > By setting REALGCC to rawgcc, Landley's toolchain could easily be used. > This would also help for using other cross-toolchains. > (note: I'm not particular about the variable, but $GCC might be a bad > choice: ISTR seeing one or two Makefiles that set that.) Have you tested if this works okay? If it's known to work, send a clean patch and I think it should be okay to apply. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.