Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:38:59 +0000 From: "Arvid E. Picciani" <aep@...s.org> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Musl-extra: C general-purpose and utility library On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:31:47 -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Personally, I think a clean, sane, bloat-free implementation of the > C++ standard library would be a lot more valuable for this kind of > work than a new non-standardized C library. for C++? pretty hard to do that, the language is horrible already :/ I like Qt, since it doesn't even try to follow the C++ spirit, but then again its weird on its own. Indeed, C is not the place to do high level stuff in. I'm still waiting for clay [http://claylabs.com/clay/] to become usable, before dropping C++ for system services. -- Arvid E. Picciani
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.