Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:21:15 +0200
From: "Arvid E. Picciani" <aep@...s.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Feelings on macros vs inline in arch/$(ARCH)/syscall_arch.h ?

On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:23:44 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:

> Using inline functions is nicer from standpoint of clean [..]
>
> Using macros [..]  could improve code generation especially on mips 
> and i386/PIC.

I use musl because i can read it. For anything performance relevant we 
get customized bionic/gnulibc from vendors.

If i may, i suggest restricting performance optimizations at the cost 
of readability to areas that actually have a measurable effect for 
someone.


-- 
Arvid E. Picciani

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.