Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 02:12:46 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: documenting musl On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 09:15:47PM -0700, nwmcsween@...il.com wrote: > Posix only describes what it must do not how it does it as musl vs > glibc vs any other libc in my opinion anyways My point was that the what vs how is an important distinction, and I don't think it's useful for us to duplicate the "what", which POSIX already did very well. The how is of course interesting to anybody reading the code, and inline comments may be a good place to put that. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.