Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:42:59 +0200 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: documenting musl 2012/9/8 Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>: >> lib9? I don't know how lib9 is compatible with the musl... > > Ok. If you promise to stop pasting random terminal shit, I promise to > remember you don't care about anything at all except mandoc. ok. correct me, but it lib9 is a libc implementation on Plan9 OS. I understand that you (suckless.org) port it into Linux. Maybe it's better to use musl instead lib9? I presented my opinion and I understand that you have a different opinion, but please, why do you think it would be a better solution than mandoc etc.? mandoc, like musl, is a new and fresh solution with supports modern expectations for the documentation system. Why old troff will be better? best regards, Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.