Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:04:12 +0200 From: philomath <philomath868@...il.com> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Musl-extra: C general-purpose and utility library Hi, (sorry for the title, I couldn't resist...) During the recent discussions about feature-test-macros and libcap, it occurred to me that we need a unified good general-purpose C library (with "good" being understood as in musl's spirit). Musl at it's core aims to be a standards-compliant libc, and minimalistic at that, that's great. but it also brings in extra baggage, plus it has no place for data-structures, algorithms, and general utility functions. Maybe we should only implement in musl the absolute minimum, and move everything else to musl-extra. there we would create something like an alternative to Glib (and -shudder- gnulib) that sucks less (or even rocks). we can build on libraries such as plan9's, DJB and derivatives, etc (taking the good from the bed). in affect creating our own standards with no nonsense baggage. who knows, in years to come we may all be working on the SMS (single musl specification). Or maybe I should stop dreaming and get some work done? Bye.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.