[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:49:01 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Todo for release?
* Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> [2012-08-15 10:36:40 -0400]:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > it seems warn(0) and err(1,0) segfault
> > (they should handle fmt==0 before passing
> > it to vfprintf)
> > and they do not print the ': ' nor the
> > __progname
>
> Thanks for the report. This should be easy to fix. By the way, is it
> worth making these functions take a lock on the file for the whole
> operation (to make it atomic)? I'm leaning towards no, since they seem
> to only be used in legacy junk that's all single-threaded anyway.
i dont mind if the file is not locked although it would not
itroduce too much overhead..
the ": " is not fixed, i think that should be added
View attachment "err.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (444 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
