Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:49:01 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Todo for release? * Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> [2012-08-15 10:36:40 -0400]: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > it seems warn(0) and err(1,0) segfault > > (they should handle fmt==0 before passing > > it to vfprintf) > > and they do not print the ': ' nor the > > __progname > > Thanks for the report. This should be easy to fix. By the way, is it > worth making these functions take a lock on the file for the whole > operation (to make it atomic)? I'm leaning towards no, since they seem > to only be used in legacy junk that's all single-threaded anyway. i dont mind if the file is not locked although it would not itroduce too much overhead.. the ": " is not fixed, i think that should be added View attachment "err.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (444 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.