Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:10:36 +0200 From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Todo for release? On 08/15/2012 12:53 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > 2012/8/15 Szabolcs Nagy<nsz@...t70.net>: >> * Daniel Cegie?ka<daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2012-08-15 10:55:06 +0200]: >>>>> - Support for __progname (Daniel) >> > We often say that we don't want to reproduce 'ugly stuff from glibc > etc.' (eg. __progname). This does not change the fact that a lot of > code will require patches to fix __progname problem. i don't think that "a lot" of programs need it. actually i never encountered it in the 200 packages i ported to sabotage, and i even doubt that it is in pkgsrc as i never heard anything about it in the irc channel. since this feature would add bloat to every program, i am strongly opposed to adding it. instead you can just do a quick sed over BSD coreutils that use it. > If Rich has taken > the effort to rewrite/fix libc, we can fix __progname... if needed > (it's really small patch.. discussed on the list). > > Daniel >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.