Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:45:50 +0200 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Design for extensible passwd[/shadow?] db support 2012/8/13 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 08:26:24PM -0400, idunham@...abit.com wrote: >> Out of curiosity, is PAM excluded from consideration? Does it require a >> dynamically-loaded library? > > PAM is not an implementation of the user database. It's for > authenticating logins. Completely different problem domain. A bit off topic: Is the traditional PAM/shadow will be supported in musl? I would like to use full PAM/shadow/tcb stack from the Owl with musl (+owl's pam modules). If not, what would be an alternative proposal? best regards, Daniel > > Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.