[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:33:02 -0400
From: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]
Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q2 on
musl 0.9.3, with patches from
http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 6b7af27ab794.
Attempted: 10659
Deps failed: 4556
Build tried: 6103
Build failed: 1132
Tests failed: 251
Success: 4720 (77.339%)
Breakdown:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-6b7af27ab794-musl-0.9.3-breakdown.txt
or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
Archive:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q2-6b7af27ab794-musl-0.9.3.tar.gz
Notes:
In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means
tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.
There were a couple regressions in the upgrade to 2012Q2 that I haven't
fixed yet.
Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). There's
some miscommunication between Ruby and musl's localtime that I'm yet to
figure out, and it causes the build to die in the docs stage. I'm told
it works elsewhere. PHP has patches I have not yet integrated. SDL
actually works, but I had a misconfiguration on the test machine (I
neglected to disable nas), so it failed due to imaginary dependencies.
If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on
the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker:
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .
As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available
via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .
With valediction,
- Gregor Richards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
