Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 05:58:40 +0200 From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl 0.9.3 released On 08/05/2012 03:00 AM, idunham@...abit.com wrote: > >> I'd also like to finish and integrate the rest of rdp's porting work >> (mips64, ppc, and microblaze) and possibly get an x32 (32-bit ABI on >> x86_64) port underway, and integrate additional hash function support >> (blowfish, sha, md5) for crypt. > All of these sound good. > I'm not sure about whether many people would be interested in x32, though?... x32 is the latest hype and a lot of work has recently been put into toolchain, kernel and debugger support. this is probably a good opportunity to get the attention of early adopters. > Something other than standard crypt (isn't that DES, which can be cracked > in a day on the right machine?) would be one of the more interesting ones > from my perspective. Remembering the recent test results, I'd be hoping > for bcrypt as well (it's where OpenCL cracking gets the least benefit). which test results are you referring to ? for my part, i think simple DES crypt() in the libc is sufficient. busybox 1.20+ ships with a decent set of hash algos to use for login, so the libc crypt code isnt used anyway.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.