Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:19:15 -0400 From: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] GLIBC ABI patches On 07/24/12 14:15, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > >>> Just nonsense aliases GNU uses... >>> Needed for ABI compatability. >> could we mark them as such? at least with a comment. >> I really like that musl is so readable. This patch adds some obfuscation that can simply be countered by marking it as "ok this is only here for reason X." > I would like to see those options behind a compile time option : It bloats musl with in many cases unneeded code. I test my compiles with musl, and I like it lean and mean. > > > Regards, > > > > Igmar These are just aliases, not code. There's no bloat there. One of the advantages of musl is its LACK of configurability: If you have “musl”, you know what precisely you're getting. With valediction, - Gregor Richards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.