Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 20:03:44 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Draft: musl promo materials On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:06:41PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:45:40 -0700 > Charlie Kester <corky1951@...cast.net> wrote: > > > > It would be good to include a list of apps that have been > > successfully compiled with musl. No need to list every such app, > > just some representative ones that will help dispel any fears about > > the library's ability to replace glibc in the most common uses. > > Somehow, listing compatible applications in PR does not > sound very encouraging, until you can run the really huge I agree completely. A compatibility list should definitely not be part of the long-term promotional strategy. Early on, it's been useful for getting people's attention that musl is a rising contender, but I also believe it presents an impression that compatibility is a concern/downside of musl. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.