Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:53:34 -0700 (PDT) From: idunham@...abit.com To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Hello > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:43:13 -0400 (EDT) > idunham@...abit.com wrote: > >> > Some news from that point. >> > >> > I spent some time building the same X11 tree as my host system uses >> > (X11R76) and now I can say that it works almost unmodified with musl >> > 0.9.1. Some notes about it: >> > - all libs compiled normally except xcb and Mesa. XCB deals with XML >> > and python that I did not installed, Mesa depends on g++. >> > (Unfortunately all X libs have now rpath hardcoded, thanks to >> > libtool's idiotic behavior. Oh.) >> > - apps compiled normally (some failed due to unset CFLAGS, was too >> > lazy to fix the build.sh) >> > - xorg-server-1.11.2: >> > - did not linked with musl 0.9.1 (missing ioperm() and iopl() >> > syscall wrappers, added manually). >> Are these wrappers available somewhere online (in a git tree or >> something)? > > I added them manually, they are just one-line system call wrappers. > Attached patch just adds them as an additional files, without declaring > them in headers (I declared them in unistd.h, but not sure, maybe > wrong place for linux-specific calls). > Wrong place: sys/io.h (not yet provided by musl) is where those go. _
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.