[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:09:48 +0200
From: Jim Meyering <jim@...ering.net>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org>
Cc: bug-gnulib@....org, musl@...ts.openwall.com, Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>, Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
Subject: Re: musl, fdopen test
Bruno Haible wrote:
...
>> My thought in having musl skip the test is to maximize performance of
>> fdopen, assuming you might be using it in a situation like on a newly
>> accept()ed network connection where every syscall counts (think
>> multi-threaded httpd). For read-only fdopen, no syscalls are needed,
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> Here's a proposed patch to remove gnulib's unintentional requirement.
>
>
> 2012-06-19 Bruno Haible <bruno@...sp.org>
>
> fdopen: Allow implementations that don't reject invalid fd arguments.
> * m4/fdopen.m4 (gl_FUNC_FDOPEN): Let the test pass if fdopen(-1,...)
> succeeds.
> Reported by Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>.
Thanks, Bruno.
That patch looks perfect.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
