Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:44:51 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: perl 5.16 tests...is shm working right? On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:28:54AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > hello, > I built perl 5.16.0 (defaults to ansi c89, but needs > SIG_BLOCK...used -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=gnu99, but _POSIX_C_SOURCE + > -std=c99 is probably enough) > Still using gcc-3.4 (with -Os) > > 10 tests failed, including both shm tests. > I had at least 500 MB of RAM completely unused, so I > wouldn't expect any issues there. > So I'm wondering if the shm support is fully working, or if that's just For the record, this is legacy sysv shm, not modern POSIX shm. Are you on a 32- or 64-bit machine? I'm guessing some of the structures and padding might be messed up on 64-bit, although I thought we looked into and fixed that a while back. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.