Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:53:49 +0200 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Vision for new platform 2012/6/10 Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com>: > Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> writes: > >> A much better approach for systems that need automatic >> stopping and starting of daemons would be to have a tiny >> daemon-supervisor process to handle it; small systems with a very >> "hands-on" admin not wanting to automate this could then skip the >> supervisor daemon and start/stop manually. > > This is exactly what daemontools and variants do, with minimal code: > http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html > http://offog.org/code/freedt.html Chapter 4.1.1 Introducing procer: http://mongrel2.org/static/book-finalch5.html code: https://github.com/zedshaw/mongrel2/tree/master/examples/procer I think that using the code from the available solutions (like daemontools, procer etc.) and based on our thoughts, we can prepare a solution that would meet our expectations... secure and simple. regards, Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.