Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:58:34 +0100 From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@...d.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: printf POSIX compliance On 8 June 2012 17:51, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: >> As regards the particular problem with freadahead, looking at the code >> suggests a workaround of -DSLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS to avoid trying to build >> the FILE-fiddling code. > > Someone building the package should not have to do this. I agree. Again, I suspect that pointing out the problems you go on to cite may influence change in gnulib. I suspect that, as you said earlier, the maintainers of gnulib have been primarily concerned in the past with porting to old, broken systems, not new ones which don't so much need their help. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.