Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:18:31 +0800 From: orc <orc@...server.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> Subject: Re: Hello On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:13:38 +0200 John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> wrote: > On 06/07/2012 02:01 PM, orc wrote: > > I'm not a developer, sorry (I have a basic-to-middle C knowledge > > enough to understand why build fails), but still can help in areas > > of application compatibility, testing and cross-compiling. Anyone > > interested? > > > hello, > as described on the webpage, the most helpful work you can do > additionally to what you suggested is > - spread the word > - file bug reports against upstream software bugtrackers/maillists > (such as the missing includes you encountered) > - convince people not to use gnulib / gnu autocrap / cmake > - you could help sabotage linux to get a proper X11 setup so that one > could start to use musl on the desktop > see https://github.com/rofl0r/sabotage > if you want to look into that, i think its most helpful to look at > the buildscripts alpine linux uses. > -- JS Okay, thanks for pointing the direction. I already have X11 stuff in my TODO list for the musl-enabled system, but now I feel it will just fail without any results with huge error logs. And I already see the X11 stuff in the sabotage tree. Does it builds correctly? At this time I think to take an older X release without some stuff I don't need. X11R7.6 build requires python and weird xml libs for example. Maybe even XFree86 (to test it in qemu for the micro desktop system project).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.