Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:24:19 -0500 From: Richard Pennington <rich@...nware.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: A little more progress today with clang/LLVM On Monday, May 21, 2012 10:53:06 PM Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:35:59PM -0500, Richard Pennington wrote: > > I'll send you the list. The only one that looked sort of bad to me was the > > out of bounds array reference. It was on the x86_64 in the > > pthread_barrier_t access. clang complained about referencing __p, > > which is out of bounds. That code is a little cryptic to me right now, > > since I'm a newbi. ;-) > Thanks! Indeed, that's broken. I must not have noticed since I'm on > x86 (32-bit). The situation with the definition of these types is > unfortunate and I might eventually change it; basically, to avoid > leaking implementation details in the public headers, and to avoid > having to change the bits headers for all archs if I change the way > these primitives work, the public headers just have a union with ints > and pointers matching the ABI's size for the type, and pthread_impl.h > has macros that map fields into these slots in such a way that the > mapping works on both 32- and 64-bit systems. > > Fixing now... > > Rich I understand. I'm just afraid about my next update.. I'm doing a git to svn sync and I know nothing about git. :-( Google is my friend, however. -Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.