Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:24:47 +0200 From: aep <aep@...s.org> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: make -i with linux-pam On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:28:59 -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Not sure what you mean here... Are you talking about using these > files > to kill processes that users left running after logging out? Or what? haha, no. I was more refering to the fact that i'm pretty sure no one _wants_ utmp. It's just that you need it around for compiling code from last century. But yeah, dropping in glibc seems like more work then just implementing it. > -lutil is part of POSIX; in musl it's an empty .a file. I'm not sure > it would be a good idea to replace libutil with something else, > because programs using stuff from POSIX that's allowed to need -lutil > might add -lutil to the link command line. How does that work with sysvinit? And a couple of utils are going to be broken too. hence i was wondering about an approach to get these working without actually having to have that stone age functionality in musl itself.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.