Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:26:11 +0200
From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc segfault at src/mman/mlockall.c

Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> writes:

> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:51:23PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote:
>> > > obase-musl still lacks a lot due to many legacy syscalls musl probably
>> > > won't implement.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@...il.com>  http://chneukirchen.org
>> > 
>> > Could libbsd help with those?
>> 
>> Is it really worth adding on more and more cruft just to get a base
>> system working?  In my opinion it would be better to flesh out sbase[1]
>> or something like it.  Requiring a compatibility shim for your core
>> utilities sounds like a bad day waiting to happen.
>
> If there are really _syscalls_ not implemented, I'd be interested in
> knowing what they are.

Sorry, not syscalls; I mean BSD libc functions such as fts(3).

-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@...il.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.