Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:51:23 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <>
Subject: Re: gcc segfault at src/mman/mlockall.c

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote:
> > obase-musl still lacks a lot due to many legacy syscalls musl probably
> > won't implement.
> >
> > --
> > Christian Neukirchen  <>
> Could libbsd help with those?

Is it really worth adding on more and more cruft just to get a base
system working?  In my opinion it would be better to flesh out sbase[1]
or something like it.  Requiring a compatibility shim for your core
utilities sounds like a bad day waiting to happen.

[1] -

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.