Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:51:23 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: gcc segfault at src/mman/mlockall.c On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote: > > obase-musl still lacks a lot due to many legacy syscalls musl probably > > won't implement. > > > > -- > > Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> http://chneukirchen.org > > Could libbsd help with those? Is it really worth adding on more and more cruft just to get a base system working? In my opinion it would be better to flesh out sbase or something like it. Requiring a compatibility shim for your core utilities sounds like a bad day waiting to happen.  - http://hg.suckless.org/sbase
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.