Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:51:03 +0300 From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org> To: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> CC: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 Around 05/02/2012 02:08 PM, Solar Designer scribbled: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:54:20PM +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote: >> Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it >> has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry. > > Why did it fail SPF? Is this anything with the list setup? > > I think we have the proper SPF record for lists.openwall.com: > > $ host -t txt lists.openwall.com > lists.openwall.com descriptive text "v=spf1 mx ip4:220.127.116.11 -all" > > Do you possibly use SPF along with mail forwarding from another address > of yours? (This is a fundamental problem of SPF.) Here are the headers that I received on the last email that I have sent to the ML: > Received: from mother.openwall.net ([::ffff:18.104.22.168]) > by ns.unixsol.org with SMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:32 +0300 > id 0000000000144123.4FA10458.00007834 > Received-SPF: none SPF=HELO; sender=mother.openwall.net; remoteip=::ffff:22.214.171.124; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; > Received-SPF: pass SPF=MAILFROM; sender=musl-return-788-gf=unixsol.org@...ts.openwall.com; remoteip=::ffff:126.96.36.199; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; > Received: (qmail 29787 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 09:54:32 -0000 > Mailing-List: contact musl-help@...ts.openwall.com; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > List-Post: <mailto:musl@...ts.openwall.com> > List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@...ts.openwall.com> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@...ts.openwall.com> > Reply-To: musl@...ts.openwall.com > Delivered-To: mailing list musl@...ts.openwall.com > Received: (qmail 29778 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 09:54:31 -0000 > Message-ID: <4FA1044C.90406@...xsol.org> > Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300 > From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org> > Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: musl@...ts.openwall.com > CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> > References: <20120424003111.GN14673@...ghtrain.aerifal.cx> <4FA10332.603@...xsol.org> > In-Reply-To: <4FA10332.603@...xsol.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: Re: [musl] Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 > Received-SPF: fail SPF=FROM; sender=gf@...xsol.org; remoteip=::ffff:188.8.131.52; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; The last line was the problem. Since openwall lists are sending the email as me as sender, my spf checks fail. I have checks for X-Mailing-Lists header but since ezmlm sets Mailing-List the checks fail. The problem is on my side. I have fixed it, sorry for the noise. -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.