Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300 From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 Around 05/02/2012 12:49 PM, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski scribbled: > Around 04/24/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Felker scribbled: >> I was just looking back at the wishlist for 1.0 dated a little over a >> year ago, and noticing that all but 3 items on it are completed. (The >> incomplete ones are static-linked dlopen support, limited ability to >> load/run glibc-linked apps/libs, and documentation.) >> >> As for 0.9, there was never a formal wishlist, but I've covered all >> the intended areas mentioned as short-term goals in the past few >> release announcements. I think musl could use some more testing >> scrutiny before the big release (we don't want it to be like gcc >> 4.7... :), so I'm going to hold off a bit; please continue to report >> bugs and app compatibility issues so we can get as much working as >> possible, with as few bugs as possible, for 0.9. > > Hi, there were talks about re-licensing musl to BSD like license, what > happened to that? Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry. -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.