Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:28:40 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try Rich, Isaac - On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:28:28PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:19:05 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > > Somebody has enabled stack protector. Either your distro (what distro > > are you using) has hacked gcc in a way different from what musl-gcc > > expects, or wireless-tools' makefile is adding -fstack-protector... > > There's no -fstack-protector, so it's Ubuntu's fault. Several distros do it these days (and Owl will start doing it soon as well), so it's becoming standard and needs to be supported. Technically, -fno-stack-protector in the musl-gcc wrapper would probably make things appear to work, but it's not necessarily a good thing to do since it might violate reasonable expectations of the user. I think it'd be better for musl to start providing the necessary symbols. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.