|
|
Message-Id: <20120421155611.c4e08d9e.idunham@lavabit.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:56:11 -0700
From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl vs wireless-tools
Well, make iwmulticall produced iwmulticall.o and a ton of errors.
But
musl-gcc -static iwmulticall.o -o iwhack
made a working binary...
(you won't find out if it's really working unless you copy or link to
iw{config,event,getid,list,priv,spy}, however)
So one of the options it's passing ends up breaking the musl-gcc link step. The source is compatible with musl, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.