[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:23:11 -0700
From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl vs wireless-tools
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:39:18 -0400
Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> > wireless-tools (version 30-pre9 from Ubuntu's repos tested) appears
> > to _hate_ musl...
> > I have yet to figure out exactly where the problem is.
> > Part of it seems to be __* macros; one of the headers
> >
> > Note-Ignore the "missing" headers other than those under linux/
> > I just ran a script that tested whether all headers could be found
> > in the musl include dir; the other headers (rfkill.h, etc) are
> > included in the sources.
> >
> > It looks like some of it may be use of linux/ headers instead of
> > sys/ headers, from checking the patches.
>
> asm/* and asm-generic/* are linux headers. If you've installed the
> linux kernel headers, all should be fine. Personally I install them
> under an alternate path and only add -I for this path when building
> programs that actually have a reason to be looking at Linux headers..
Getting farther...
But still not working.
Here it looks like musl-gcc may be forgetting the -lm I gave it.
Isaac Dunham
Download attachment "make.errs" of type "application/octet-stream" (865 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
