Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:23:11 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl vs wireless-tools On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:39:18 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > wireless-tools (version 30-pre9 from Ubuntu's repos tested) appears > > to _hate_ musl... > > I have yet to figure out exactly where the problem is. > > Part of it seems to be __* macros; one of the headers > > > > Note-Ignore the "missing" headers other than those under linux/ > > I just ran a script that tested whether all headers could be found > > in the musl include dir; the other headers (rfkill.h, etc) are > > included in the sources. > > > > It looks like some of it may be use of linux/ headers instead of > > sys/ headers, from checking the patches. > > asm/* and asm-generic/* are linux headers. If you've installed the > linux kernel headers, all should be fine. Personally I install them > under an alternate path and only add -I for this path when building > programs that actually have a reason to be looking at Linux headers.. Getting farther... But still not working. Here it looks like musl-gcc may be forgetting the -lm I gave it. Isaac Dunham Download attachment "make.errs" of type "application/octet-stream" (865 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.