Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:48:37 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl 0.8.8 released * Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> [2012-04-18 22:21:57 -0700]: > Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:07:56 -0400 > > Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > > > > > With this release, musl seems to have complete interface-level > > > coverage of ISO C99 and POSIX 2008. There are still some features > > > I forget what they were, but ISTR seeing one or two missing functions > > in one of the headers I worked on. > Ignore the above claim--looking back over the headers, I guess I was > wrong. > btw there are approximate api coverage tables (generated using ctags and nm vs posix functions and c99 annex b) http://repo.or.cz/w/musl-tools.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/tab_posix.html http://repo.or.cz/w/musl-tools.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/c99.html c99 is really completely covered (wchar_t is misreported, imaginary is compiler issue, fma macros are arch dependent)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.