Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:02:09 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: libm * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2012-01-23 20:12:15 +0100]: > * Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> [2012-01-23 12:07:15 -0500]: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:41:52PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > many functions are the same in glibc and the various > > > bsd libcs (they are mostly based on fdlibm, but glibc > > > 64bit double precision functions are from the gpl > > > licensed libultim) > > > > You really mean double, not extended? That's odd since fdlibm covers > > double.. I wonder when/why they switched. > > > sorry libultim is lgpl the source tree contains a gpl license for some reason, but all source comments say lgpl, both in glibc and the original files meanwhile i compared some implementations openbsd, freebsd and glibc are worth to look at (netbsd and bionic libms seem to be less maintained)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.