Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:19:40 +0100 From: aep <aep@...s.org> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Dynamic linker refactoring On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:05:54 -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm leaning towards stripping out the vdso > (linux-gate) support at the dynamic linker level entirely, and > instead > using Nik's original design for vdso-assisted clock_gettime which can > work with static linking too. isn't the vdso there for much more then just clock_gettime? Ie for a whole bunch of syscalls that otherwise need to go through the slow interrupt path?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.