Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:19:40 +0100
From: aep <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: Dynamic linker refactoring

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:05:54 -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> Hi all,
>  I'm leaning towards stripping out the vdso
> (linux-gate) support at the dynamic linker level entirely, and 
> instead
> using Nik's original design for vdso-assisted clock_gettime which can
> work with static linking too.

isn't the vdso there for much more then just clock_gettime? Ie for a 
whole bunch of syscalls that otherwise need to go through the slow 
interrupt path?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.