Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:08:41 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: compatability: heirloom-utils +.5, libarchive -1 * Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> [2012-01-06 03:41:10 -0500]: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:05:26PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:38:08 +0100 > > In general, the POSIX variants are about as close to precisely > > standards-conformant as you can get; unfortunately, the plain old UNIX > > versions are default. I note, though, that nl presumably ought to start > > numbering at 0 when specified; instead, it starts at 1 (SU3/SUS > > variants), skipping the line that would be numbered 0. The old unix > > version apparently didn't recognize -b. > > But I figure it beats Busybox any day--and I'd rather not use GNU > > bloat. > > I'm not sure what you're talking about. Busybox does not contain GNU imho he meant that heirloom beats busybox in posix conformance and functionality and much less bloated than gnu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.