[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db91a0db355d632f3bec21e0f0d826ec@exys.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:25:01 +0200
From: aep <aep@...s.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: extended locale extentions
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:17:04 +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> that is isspace_l, isupper_l , etc...
> these are standard, not c standard, but posix standard
i used the wrong examples. what i meant was
strtol_l, strtoul_l, strtoll_l, possibly others...
> i wonder if a dummy implementation is ok
> eg
> #define foo_l(c, l) foo(c)
> (maybe with a check if l is the c/posix locale)
that's pretty much what is there. It's good enough for me (as my use
case only has one locale), but i was wondering if its ok before i work
on a patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
