Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:25:01 +0200
From: aep <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: extended locale extentions

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:17:04 +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> that is isspace_l, isupper_l , etc...
> these are standard, not c standard, but posix standard

i used the wrong examples.  what i meant was
strtol_l, strtoul_l, strtoll_l, possibly others...

> i wonder if a dummy implementation is ok
> eg
> #define foo_l(c, l) foo(c)
> (maybe with a check if l is the c/posix locale)

that's pretty much what is there. It's good enough for me (as my use 
case only has one locale), but i was wondering if its ok before i work 
on a patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.