|
Message-ID: <20110810114926.GA30983@openwall.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:49:26 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cluts makefiles On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > >To apply a patch, you do not need two trees, and you do not need to > >match the top-level directory names to those seen in the patch file. > >Rather, you may do something like: > > > >cp -a cluts cluts-to-patch > >cd cluts-to-patch > >patch -p1< ../patch-file > > Hmm, I did try`patch -p1 < ../patch-file` *shrugs* > Still, thanks you for the instructions anyway. At least I can be sure > what I'm doing. Well, it sounds like your source tree was in fact changed from the revision that Vasiliy's patch was for, then. Such things happen. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.