Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:23 +0200
From: <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: Make

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:56:18 -0400, Rich Felker <> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:03:09PM +0200, wrote:
>> But make depends on ans on which are not
>> provided
>> by musl..
> Actually maybe I misunderstood - are you trying to use a glibc-linked
> "make" in a chroot that only has musl? If so, it won't work. You could
> instead static-link all your glibc programs (so they'll work in the
> chroot) then replace them with musl-linked ones as soon as you can..
> Rich

Okay, thanks for these explanations :)
I tried something, i began to try to use the gcc wrapper to link make to
but i had some errors : some headers were missing (ar.h / sys/cdefs.h)
So I tried to use the system's headers (Archlinux) but the compilation
failed. (copy to /usr/local/musl/include)

I know, i have a lot of problems, i'm really bad :D


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.