Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:23 +0200 From: <nicolas@...lier-web.com> To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Make On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:56:18 -0400, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:03:09PM +0200, nicolas@...lier-web.com wrote: >> But make depends on ld-linux.so.2 ans on librt.so.1 which are not >> provided >> by musl.. > > Actually maybe I misunderstood - are you trying to use a glibc-linked > "make" in a chroot that only has musl? If so, it won't work. You could > instead static-link all your glibc programs (so they'll work in the > chroot) then replace them with musl-linked ones as soon as you can.. > > Rich Hmm, Okay, thanks for these explanations :) I tried something, i began to try to use the gcc wrapper to link make to musl, but i had some errors : some headers were missing (ar.h / sys/cdefs.h) So I tried to use the system's headers (Archlinux) but the compilation failed. (copy to /usr/local/musl/include) I know, i have a lot of problems, i'm really bad :D Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.