[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110808205520.GN132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:55:20 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Make
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:03:09PM +0200, nicolas@...lier-web.com wrote:
> Yop !
>
> Now, i'm able to compile and to run musl as the only system of the system
> (chroot) but there 2 things that i don't understand.
>
> 1) There is no /lib/ld-linux.so.2 ?
/lib/ld-musl-i386.so.1
If you're building a native compiler rather than using the wrapper you
should edit the specs to point the linker here (-dynamic-linker option).
> 2) How can i link programs with musl if i don't use gcc ?
>
> For example, i managed to compile Make 3.82 with pcc :
> CC=pcc ./configure --prefix=/usr \
> --build=i586-pc-linux-gnu --host=i586-pc-linux-gnu
> CC=pcc make
> CC=pcc make install
You should not need --build or --host unless you're doing weird
cross-compiling stuff. In a native environment (which you have) just
CC=pcc ./configure --prefix=/usr && make should be all you need.
> But make depends on ld-linux.so.2 ans on librt.so.1 which are not provided
musl provides an empty librt.a which should satisfy anything using
-lrt. All standard library functions are in the main library; it's not
broken down into parts because that just makes the system slow,
bloated, and harder to maintain.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
