Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:52:45 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Unit tests On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:32:57AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:30:28PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > Wow licenses are a much more popular discussion topic than > > > development... > > > > Sorry about that. I should have posted the development related stuff I > > told you on IRC yesterday to this mailing list instead. I will do that > > next time. In fact... I'll post some of it in here now. :-) > > On mplayer, we called this kind of topic a bikeshed. ;-) Right. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/bikeshed.html http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshed Yet I think it is fairly important to decide on a license for the unit tests suite. Perhaps you can just make a determination? I want to make sure that whatever code Luka submits always has a suitable license on it. This is my responsibility as a GSoC org admin. In fact, once we decide on a license to use (at least initially), I think we should ask Luka to re-post the code he has already written with the proper licensing statement on it. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.