Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:26:08 +0100 From: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com> To: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com> Cc: fweimer@...hat.com, gcc@....gnu.org, ville.voutilainen@...il.com, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libstdc++@....gnu.org, libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, jwakely@...hat.com, enh@...gle.com Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() On 11/18/20 12:11 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> Nice! >> Please update me on any feedback you receive. > > Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14 > discussion is waiting for those. > >> So glibc will basically hold this patch >> at least until the WG answers to that, right? > > I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is > relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in > glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out > glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14. > Hi Joseph, Yes, that's what I would expect, but it's been a long time since I sent the patch, so that's why I asked. Maybe glibc is busy now with other more urgent things, I don't know. Thanks, Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.