Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:11:00 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <>
To: Alejandro Colomar <>
CC: <>, <>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	<>, <>
Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote:

> Nice!
> Please update me on any feedback you receive.

Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14 
discussion is waiting for those.

> So glibc will basically hold this patch
> at least until the WG answers to that, right?

I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is 
relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in 
glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out 
glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14.

Joseph S. Myers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.