Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:11:00 +0000 From: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com> To: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com> CC: <fweimer@...hat.com>, <gcc@....gnu.org>, <ville.voutilainen@...il.com>, <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <libstdc++@....gnu.org>, <libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com>, <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, <jwakely@...hat.com>, <enh@...gle.com> Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems() On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote: > Nice! > Please update me on any feedback you receive. Apparently the author is planning new versions of those papers so WG14 discussion is waiting for those. > So glibc will basically hold this patch > at least until the WG answers to that, right? I think that whether C2x gets an array-size feature of some kind is relevant to whether such a feature goes in glibc and what it looks like in glibc, but the fact that it will be considered in WG14 doesn't rule out glibc considering such a feature without waiting for WG14. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@...esourcery.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.