kernel-hardening - [PATCH v8 0/6] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:49:17 -0700
From: Roy Yang <royyang@...gle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, keescook@...omium.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alex.popov@...ux.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, 
	catalin.marinas@....com, corbet@....net, david@...hat.com, 
	elena.reshetova@...el.com, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, 
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, vbabka@...e.cz, will@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/6] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall

Thanks Ted, Casey and Al Viro. I am sorry for the inconvenience.

I tried to follow the instructions listed under
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210330205750.428816-1-keescook@chromium.org/
using git-send-email

Thought that will reply to the original thread with the original
subject . Let me know what I can do to correct this to avoid
confusion.


- Roy


On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:13 PM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:17:44PM -0700, Roy Yang wrote:
> > > Both Android and Chrome OS really want this feature; For Container-Optimized OS, we have customers
> > > interested in the defense too.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: I1eb1b726007aa8f9c374b934cc1c690fb4924aa3
> >
> >       You forgot to tell what patch you are refering to.  Your
> > Change-Id (whatever the hell that is) doesn't help at all.  Don't
> > assume that keys in your internal database make sense for the
> > rest of the world, especially when they appear to contain a hash
> > of something...
>
> The Change-Id fails to have any direct search hits at lore.kernel.org.
> However, it turn up Roy's original patch, and clicking on the
> message-Id in the "In-Reply-Field", it apperas Roy was replying to
> this message:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210330205750.428816-1-keescook@chromium.org/
>
> which is the head of this patch series:
>
> Subject: [PATCH v8 0/6] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall
>
> That being said, it would have been better if the original subject
> line had been preserved, and it's yet another example of how the
> lore.kernel.org URL is infinitely better than the Change-Id.  :-)
>
>                                               - Ted

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.