[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:49:36 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] tracing/probe: Manual replacement of the
deprecated strlcpy() with return values
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:12:27 +0100
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com> wrote:
> The strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first, it is dangerous if
> the source buffer lenght is unbounded or possibility non NULL-terminated.
> It can lead to linear read overflows, crashes, etc...
>
> As recommended in the deprecated interfaces [1], it should be replaced
> by strscpy.
>
> This commit replaces all calls to strlcpy that handle the return values
> by the corresponding strscpy calls with new handling of the return
> values (as it is quite different between the two functions).
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 3cf7128e1ad3..f9583afdb735 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -154,12 +154,11 @@ fetch_store_string(unsigned long addr, void *dest, void *base)
> u8 *dst = get_loc_data(dest, base);
> void __user *src = (void __force __user *) addr;
>
> - if (unlikely(!maxlen))
> - return -ENOMEM;
Don't remove the above. You just broke the else side.
> -
> - if (addr == FETCH_TOKEN_COMM)
> - ret = strlcpy(dst, current->comm, maxlen);
> - else
> + if (addr == FETCH_TOKEN_COMM) {
> + ret = strscpy(dst, current->comm, maxlen);
> + if (ret == -E2BIG)
> + return -ENOMEM;
I'm not sure the above is what we want. current->comm is always nul
terminated, and not only that, it will never be bigger than TASK_COMM_LEN.
If the "dst" location is smaller than comm (maxlen < TASK_COMM_LEN), it is
still OK to copy a partial string. It should not return -ENOMEM which looks
to be what happens with this patch.
In other words, it looks like this patch breaks the current code in more
ways than one.
-- Steve
> + } else
> ret = strncpy_from_user(dst, src, maxlen);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> if (ret == maxlen)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
