Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:03:47 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <>
To: Jann Horn <>
Cc: James Morris <>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <>,
 Al Viro <>, Andy Lutomirski <>,
 Anton Ivanov <>, Arnd Bergmann
 <>, Casey Schaufler <>,
 Jeff Dike <>, Jonathan Corbet <>,
 Kees Cook <>, Michael Kerrisk <>,
 Richard Weinberger <>, Shuah Khan <>,
 Vincent Dagonneau <>,
 Kernel Hardening <>,
 Linux API <>,
 linux-arch <>,
 "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <>,
 linux-fsdevel <>,
 kernel list <>,
 linux-security-module <>,
 the arch/x86 maintainers <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 00/12] Landlock LSM

On 14/01/2021 04:22, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Mickaël Salaün <> wrote:
>> This patch series adds new built-time checks, a new test, renames some
>> variables and functions to improve readability, and shift syscall
>> numbers to align with -next.
> Sorry, I've finally gotten around to looking at v26 - I hadn't
> actually looked at v25 either yet. I think there's still one remaining
> small issue in the filesystem access logic, but I think that's very
> simple to fix, as long as we agree on what the expected semantics are.
> Otherwise it basically looks good, apart from some typos.
> I think v27 will be the final version of this series. :) (And I'll try
> to actually look at that version much faster - I realize that waiting
> for code reviews this long sucks.)

I'm improving the tests, especially with bind mounts and overlayfs
tests. The v27 will also contains a better documentation to clarify the
semantic and explain how these mounts are handled. Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.