Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:22:50 +0100
From: Jann Horn <>
To: Mickaël Salaün <>
Cc: James Morris <>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <>, 
	Al Viro <>, Andy Lutomirski <>, 
	Anton Ivanov <>, Arnd Bergmann <>, 
	Casey Schaufler <>, Jeff Dike <>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <>, Kees Cook <>, 
	Michael Kerrisk <>, Richard Weinberger <>, Shuah Khan <>, 
	Vincent Dagonneau <>, 
	Kernel Hardening <>, Linux API <>, 
	linux-arch <>, 
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <>, linux-fsdevel <>, 
	kernel list <>, 
	linux-security-module <>, 
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 00/12] Landlock LSM

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Mickaël Salaün <> wrote:
> This patch series adds new built-time checks, a new test, renames some
> variables and functions to improve readability, and shift syscall
> numbers to align with -next.

Sorry, I've finally gotten around to looking at v26 - I hadn't
actually looked at v25 either yet. I think there's still one remaining
small issue in the filesystem access logic, but I think that's very
simple to fix, as long as we agree on what the expected semantics are.
Otherwise it basically looks good, apart from some typos.

I think v27 will be the final version of this series. :) (And I'll try
to actually look at that version much faster - I realize that waiting
for code reviews this long sucks.)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.