Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:46:59 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <>
To: Sami Tolvanen <>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <>,
	Will Deacon <>,
	Masahiro Yamada <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <>,
	Kees Cook <>,
	clang-built-linux <>,
	Kernel Hardening <>,
	linux-arch <>,
	linux-arm-kernel <>,
	linux-kbuild <>,
	LKML <>,
	PCI <>, Jian Cai <>,
	Kristof Beyls <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] Add support for Clang LTO

On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 12:09:31PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Sure, looks good to me. However, I think we should also test for
> LLVM=1 to avoid possible further issues with mismatched toolchains
> instead of only checking for llvm-nm and llvm-ar.

It might still be worth testing for $(AR) and $(NM) because in theory, a
user could say 'make AR=ar LLVM=1'. Highly unlikely I suppose but worth


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.